Dogs were the first domesticated animal, with humans and dogs
sharing more than 40,000 years of social interactions and life together.
According to the co-domestication hypothesis, this process allowed
humans and dogs to evolve special emotional signals and cognitive skills
that favor mutual understanding. We know, for example, that over the
millennia, dogs have evolved the ability to understand human words,
iconic signs, and other gestures, and research has shown that dogs can
even use tone of voice and facial expressions to recognize human
emotions. Beyond personal testimony from dog lovers, however, little
attention has been paid to how well humans can understand their canine
counterparts.
In the current study, led by Federica Amici of the Max Planck
Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology and Juliane Bräuer of the Max
Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, the researchers set
out to understand how well humans can understand the emotional displays
of dogs, and where that understanding comes from.
How well do we understand our species' best friend?
In order to test how well humans can understand the emotions behind
dog facial expressions, researchers collected photographs of dogs,
chimpanzees, and humans displaying either happy, sad, angry, neutral, or
fearful emotions as substantiated by the photographers. They then
recruited 89 adult participants and 77 child participants and
categorized them according to their age, the dog-positivity of their
cultural context, and the participants' personal history of dog
ownership.
Each participant was presented with photographs of dogs, chimps, and
humans, and asked to rate how much the individual in the picture
displayed happiness, sadness, anger, or fear. Adults were also asked to
determine the context in which the picture had been taken (e.g., playing
with a trusted conspecific partner; directly before attacking a
conspecific). The results of the study showed that, while some dog
emotions can be recognized from early on, the ability to reliably
recognize dog emotions is mainly acquired through age and experience. In
adults, the probability of recognizing dog emotions was higher for
participants who grew up in a cultural context with a positive attitude
towards dogs, regardless of whether they owned a dog themselves.
Without a dog-positive context, we could be barking up the wrong tree
A dog-postive cultural background, one in which dogs are closely
integrated into human life and considered highly important, may result
in a higher level of passive exposure and increased inclination and
interest in dogs, making humans better at recognizing dogs' emotions
even without a history of personal dog ownership. "These results are
noteworthy," says Amici, "because they suggest that it is not
necessarily direct experience with dogs that affects humans' ability to
recognize their emotions, but rather the cultural milieu in which humans
develop."
The researchers also found that regardless of age or experience with
dogs, all participants were able to identify anger and happiness
reliably. While these results may suggest an innate ability favored by
the co-domestication hypothesis, it is also possible that humans learn
to recognize these emotions quickly, even with limited exposure. Other
than anger and happiness, the children in the study were not good at
identifying dog emotions. They recognized anger and happiness more
reliably in dogs than in chimps, but otherwise identified dog emotions
as poorly as they did chimpanzee emotions, suggesting that the ability
to understand how dogs are feeling is not innate.
"We think it would be valuable to conduct future studies that seek
to determine exactly which cultural aspects affect one's ability to read
dog emotions, and to include real-life stimuli and body expressions in
addition to instructed stimuli and facial expressions," states Bräuer.
"In this way, we could develop a better understanding of inter-cultural
variation in emotion recognition. Hopefully this information could be
used to reduce the occurrence of negative incidents between humans and
dogs that are caused by humans' inability to read dog signals."